Vartų skandalas: Gatesas: netikri gydytojai prieštarauja RFK Jr.

Nepriklausomos užsienio naujienos... Vartų skandalas: Gatesas: netikri gydytojai prieštarauja RFK Jr.

In an astonishing twist of political intrigue, a supposed advocacy group, the "Committee to Protect Health Care," has been exposed as an Astroturf organization with ties to Bill Gates, aimed at undermining the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services. This revelation comes amidst claims of thousands of doctors opposing Kennedy, yet the petition accepts signatures without verification, casting a shadow over the credibility of this opposition.

A “committee” that reportedly opposes the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services, turns out to be a Bill Gates-backed “Astroturf” organization that accepts fake signatories.

The “Committee to Protect Health Care,” published an open letter declaring that thousands of doctors are “appalled by Donald Trump’s decision” to appoint Kennedy.

Apparently more than 15,000 doctors signed the letter and have been urging senators to vote against confirming Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as President Trump’s pick for secretary of health and human services.

Breitbart reports: However, there is no verification process for signatories. (Breitbart News was able to sign up as Dr. Donald Duck, OG, of Disney World, FL, specializing in podiatry.) The anti-Kennedy petition simply accepts any signature from anyone.

Others have tried the same experiment, including fitness influencer Jillian Michaels and provocateur Alex Jones.

The Committee to Protect Health Care is a 501(c)4 organization, meaning that it does not have to reveal its donors.

However, a related 501(c)3 charity, The Committee to Protect Health Care Fund, does have to reveal its donors. It is funded in part by the “left-of-center Sixteen Thirty Fund (1630 Fund) and Hopewell Fund.” The Hopewell Fund, in turn, has “hired Arabella Advisors, a leading national philanthropy services firm, to manage its project hosting and fiscal sponsorship services.” The Sixteen Thirty Fund is likewise managed by the Arabella Advisors organization.

Arabella’s donors includeBill Gates, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg,” according to the Capital Research Center: “Each of them has given a tremendous amount of money to (or through) the main network of Arabella Advisors-managed nonprofits and used it to create policy advocacy projects for their favorite pet sociopolitical issues.”

A Soros-backed PAC has also been exposed as misleading the campaign and using unverified claims to obstruct RFK Jr.’s Health Secretary nomination.

In the video below, Alex Jones asks why is Bill Gates still walking the streets and not in prison where he would not be a threat to human civilization?

Based on the information you provided:

  • The "Committee to Protect Health Care" published a letter opposing RFK Jr.'s nomination, claiming it had the support of over 15,000 doctors. However, the signatory process lacked verification, with Breitbart News and others like Jillian Michaels and Alex Jones able to sign up with fake names.
  • This committee is linked to Bill Gates through the Arabella Advisors network, which manages funds like the Sixteen Thirty Fund and Hopewell Fund. These entities are known to be funded by major donors including Gates, Soros, and Zuckerberg, with the intention of influencing policy through their nonprofit networks.
  • A significant scandal has emerged accusing Gates and his associated groups of orchestrating a campaign to block RFK Jr.'s confirmation using deceptive practices, including the use of fake signatures to inflate opposition.
  • Alex Jones, a prominent figure in alternative media, has publicly criticized these actions, questioning the legal and ethical implications for Bill Gates and calling for accountability.
  • The narrative around this scandal suggests a broader critique of influential figures manipulating public opinion and policy through dark money and deceptive advocacy.

This situation highlights concerns about transparency, the influence of billionaires in politics, and the integrity of public discourse on critical appointments like that of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. 

Note: The references to Alex Jones and specific posts on X suggest this is part of a larger, possibly controversial, narrative around political influence and public health policy. Always consider the source and potential biases when evaluating such claims.

Rašyti komentarą

Naujesnė Senesni

Nemokami skelbimai

Susisiekimo forma