mRNA vakcinų krizės atskleidimas: Vėžio antplūdis ir pasaulinis sąmokslas

Įdomus Pasaulis - Atraskite viską vienoje vietoje! mRNA vakcinų krizės atskleidimas: Vėžio antplūdis ir pasaulinis sąmokslas

Unveiling the mRNA Vaccine Crisis: Cancer Surge and Global Conspiracy
Introduction: A Medical Breakthrough or a Global Catastrophe?

The emergence of mRNA vaccines was hailed as a triumph of modern medicine, a beacon of hope in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Developed at unprecedented speed by companies like Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca, these vaccines promised to save millions of lives. But four years after their global rollout, a chilling question looms: were these vaccines a lifesaving innovation, or have they unleashed a silent health crisis? A groundbreaking study from Ural State Medical University in Yekaterinburg, Russia, led by Dr. Angelina Alekseevna Seliverstova and Professor Oleg Germanovich Makeev, alongside a 25,000-page dossier compiled by Russian scientists, suggests the latter. Their findings point to a disturbing correlation between mRNA vaccines and a surge in aggressive "turbo cancers," raising alarms about their safety and sparking a geopolitical firestorm.

The Russian Dossier: A Bioweapon Exposed?

In a dramatic turn of events, Russian President Vladimir Putin has delivered a 25,000-page dossier to former U.S. President Donald Trump, claiming that mRNA vaccines were not a public health measure but a military-grade bioweapon orchestrated by U.S. agencies like DARPA and Big Pharma giants. According to Russian intelligence, these vaccines, in development since at least 2011, were deployed under the guise of a global health crisis. The dossier, meticulously compiled by Russia’s top medical scientists, alleges a deliberate cover-up of catastrophic side effects, including a global surge in deadly cancers.

At the heart of this controversy is the study by Seliverstova and Makeev, published in a Russian medical journal (source). Their review of scientific literature, U.S. CDC data, and VAERS reports reveals a staggering 2,579 cancer-related adverse events linked to mRNA vaccines between December 2020 and August 2022. Most alarming is the reported 1,433-fold increase in ovarian cancer risk post-vaccination, a statistic that has sent shockwaves through the medical community.

Is this true? You decide:

The Science Behind the Crisis: Spike Protein and DNA Damage

The mRNA vaccines work by instructing cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which triggers an immune response. However, the Russian study identifies the spike protein as a "toxin-like" entity with devastating effects. It inhibits DNA repair mechanisms, particularly homologous recombination, by up to 90%, leading to an accumulation of mutations that can trigger cancer. The spike protein’s similarity to glycoproteins in rabies and HIV, as well as its interaction with tumor suppressor proteins like p53 and BRCA1, further exacerbates the risk, particularly in organs like the ovaries, breast, and prostate.

Moreover, the study highlights the role of lipid nanoparticles, used to deliver mRNA, in inducing inflammatory cytokines and macrophage death, contributing to systemic toxicity. The Russian dossier goes further, suggesting that the spike protein’s persistence in the body—lasting at least 60 days—causes "spikeopathy," a condition linked to inflammation, thrombosis, and tissue damage. This aligns with reports of increased myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young men after their second mRNA dose, as acknowledged by the U.S. Department of Health (CDC).

A Global Health Crisis: Turbo Cancers and Beyond

The term "turbo cancers" has emerged to describe the aggressive, fast-moving malignancies observed post-vaccination. According to the Russian study and corroborating data from the McCullough Foundation, countries with high mRNA vaccine uptake, such as Germany and the UK, are witnessing unprecedented spikes in cancer and excess mortality. A global analysis of 145 nations found vaccination programs linked to 291% more cases and 205% more deaths than expected (McCullough Foundation).

Even more unsettling is the claim that mRNA can transfer from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals through close contact, including sexual intercourse. Russian researchers cite cases of unvaccinated patients suffering cardiac events and strokes after receiving blood transfusions from vaccinated donors, suggesting contamination of the global blood supply. Dr. Ben Marble and Dr. Lewis have echoed these concerns, warning of compromised immune systems and discolored blood in unvaccinated individuals exposed to vaccinated partners (Planet Today).

Geopolitical Implications: A Call for Accountability

The Russian dossier doesn’t just point fingers at Big Pharma—it accuses key figures like Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla of orchestrating a globalist agenda rooted in eugenics. Russian officials compare the mRNA rollout to a war crime, invoking international treaties that classify biological weapons development as punishable by death. The dossier’s delivery to Trump at the Alaska summit signals a bold geopolitical move, with Putin positioning himself as a whistleblower against Western elites.

This narrative aligns with claims from figures like RFK Jr., who has long criticized the vaccine industry’s ties to globalist agendas. The dossier suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic was a planned crisis, a pretext for rolling out a decades-long eugenics project disguised as public health. While these claims are explosive, they resonate with historical precedents, such as Frederick Osborn’s 1968 admission that eugenics goals would persist under new names (source).

The Safety Debate: Are Adenovirus Vaccines the Answer?

In light of these findings, Seliverstova and Makeev propose a shift to updated adenovirus vector vaccines, which have shown fewer serious side effects. Unlike mRNA vaccines, adenovirus-based vaccines (e.g., AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1) do not rely on lipid nanoparticles or prolonged spike protein production, potentially reducing toxicity. However, even these vaccines are not without risks, as cases of thrombocytopenia have been reported post-vaccination.

The safety concerns surrounding mRNA vaccines demand urgent action. The Russian study calls for a global reassessment of vaccination strategies, prioritizing transparency and independent research. Meanwhile, the public is left grappling with a profound question: can we trust the institutions that championed these vaccines?

The Emotional Toll: A Call to Action

The implications of this crisis are deeply personal. Families have lost loved ones to sudden cancers, heart conditions, and unexplained deaths. Young men face heightened risks of myocarditis, while unvaccinated individuals fear unintended exposure through blood transfusions or intimacy. The betrayal felt by those who trusted the vaccine narrative is palpable, fueling demands for accountability and justice.

The Russian dossier and the Yekaterinburg study are a wake-up call. They challenge us to question the motives of those in power and demand answers. Were we misled by a global health campaign, or is this the tip of a darker conspiracy? The truth may lie in the 25,000 pages now in Trump’s hands, but it’s up to us to keep the pressure on.

Conclusion: A Global Reckoning

The mRNA vaccine saga is far from over. As evidence mounts linking these vaccines to a surge in cancers and chronic illnesses, the world stands at a crossroads. The Russian dossier, backed by rigorous scientific analysis, paints a chilling picture of a health crisis engineered by design. Whether you view it as a bioweapon plot or a tragic misstep, one thing is clear: the truth cannot be buried forever.

Join the conversation. Share your thoughts in the comments below, and let’s demand transparency from those who shaped this crisis. The stakes are too high to stay silent.

Authors: Dr. Angelina Alekseevna Seliverstova, Student, Ural State Medical University; Professor Oleg Germanovich Makeev, Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Head of the Department, Ural State Medical University.

References

  1. Fire, A., et al. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391(6669), 806–811. Link
  2. Adams, D., et al. (2018). Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic, for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(1), 11–21. Link
  3. Balwani, M., et al. (2020). Phase 3 trial of RNAi therapeutic Givosiran for acute intermittent porphyria. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(24), 2289–2301. Link
  4. Lamb, Y.N. (2021). Inclisiran: first approval. Drugs, 81, 389–395. Link
  5. Parry, P.I., et al. (2023). 'Spikeopathy': COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA. Biomedicines, 11(8), 2287. Link
  6. Bergman, F. (2023). CDC: 143,233% Surge in Fatal Cancers Among Vaxxed Americans. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Link
  7. Ndeupen, S., et al. (2021). The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory. iScience, 24(12). Link

Share Your Opinion

What do you think about the mRNA vaccine safety concerns? Are we facing a global health crisis, or is this a geopolitical exaggeration? Leave your comments below!

Post a Comment

Ankstesnis įrašas Kitas įrašas

Nemokami skelbimai

Contact Form